Working Families For Victoria
Childcare
We know just how important safe, affordable childcare is for working families. It means kids are properly looked after, parents can actually get to work, and every child gets a fair start early.
In February 2025, parliament voted on the Three Day Guarantee – a law giving every eligible family three days a week of subsidised childcare, worth about $1,460 a year for a family on $50,000 to $100,000. Pauline Hanson voted no on it, twice.
Now she's proposing childcare should be less subsidised, to “encourage parents to look after their own children” – part of One Nation's income-splitting policy. So we dug deeper to check how she's actually voted on it.
- 2025 – Hanson voted no on the Three Day Guarantee twice, a bill that went on to give more than 100,000 families extra subsidised hours. Malcolm Roberts voted the same way, and Barnaby Joyce voted no against the same bill in the House.
- 2019 – families with high-needs kids had been left with nowhere to send them, and parliament had the chance to get emergency funding out to them. Hanson voted no.
- 2017 – when the people looking after our kids were earning as little as $21 an hour, parliament voted on giving them a pay rise. Hanson and Roberts voted no.
One Nation's current policy is to scrap the childcare subsidy altogether and replace it with a tax deduction instead.
We'd rather you look into this yourself than take our word for it. See the full record on childcare, with every vote sourced.
Sources
- One Nation, income-splitting policy statement.
- They Vote For You – Three Day Guarantee Bill, House second reading, 13 February 2025; Senate second and third reading, 13 February 2025.
- Minister for Education, “Albanese Government introduces legislation to guarantee 3 days of early education and care”, 5 February 2025.
- Parliament of Australia, Senate Hansard, 12 February 2019 (In Home Care Program motion).
- They Vote For You – “Child Care – Acknowledge work & increase pay”, Senate division, 7 September 2017.
Wages
Working families rely on wages to cover the mortgage or the rent, put meals on the table, and pay for their kids' education. None of that gets easier if wages stand still.
Wages don't rise on their own – it usually takes a vote in parliament to make it happen. In 2023, parliament voted to make it a criminal offence for an employer to knowingly underpay a worker. Malcolm Roberts, a sitting One Nation senator, voted no.
We were surprised, so we checked the record. Turns out that's not a one-off position. Over two decades, Pauline Hanson, Roberts, Barnaby Joyce and, more recently, Tyron Whitten have voted against or sought to weaken law after law built to raise wages, protect penalty rates, or stop pay being undercut.
- 2025 – when parliament moved to lock in protections against future cuts to penalty and overtime rates, Hanson, Roberts and Whitten voted to weaken those protections.
- 2023 – Roberts voted no, twice, to the law requiring equal pay for people doing the same job through a labour hire firm. Freight workers went on to pick up as much as $8,000 a year under the change, flight attendants up to $20,000. The same law made it a criminal offence to underpay a worker – Roberts voted no to that too.
- 2022 – Hanson voted against the core of Secure Jobs, Better Pay, the government's own legislation built to get wages moving.
- 2014 – Pauline Hanson: “Get rid of penalty rates, and I'd also say get rid of the 17.5% leave loading.”
Don't just take our word for it. See the full record on wages, with every vote sourced.
Sources
- They Vote For You – Pauline Hanson, Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Secure Jobs, Better Pay) Bill 2022.
- They Vote For You – Malcolm Roberts, Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Closing Loopholes No. 2) Bill 2023, second and third reading.
- Department of Employment and Workplace Relations, “Thousands of Australian workers get more pay under Same Job Same Pay laws”, 21 November 2025.
- Parliament of Australia, Fair Work Amendment (Protecting Penalty and Overtime Rates) Bill 2025, division of 28 August 2025.
- Courier Mail, “Video shows One Nation leader Pauline Hanson waiting for penalty rates to be scrapped entirely”, 1 March 2017.
Public Schools
Public schools often run on canteen rosters, fundraisers, and parents chipping in for things you'd assume were already covered. Working families expect their local public school to get a fair go, not just what's left over.
There's a Commonwealth fund for upgrading school buildings – classrooms, halls, new equipment – that only private schools can apply for. Public schools aren't eligible at all.
Every time parliament's had a chance to fix that, One Nation MPs have voted no.
- December 2019 – a $10 million hardship fund for schools doing it tough in the drought, after public schools had already been excluded from an existing Commonwealth program. Hanson and Roberts voted no. The vote tied 32 all – if it had gone the other way, those schools would have got the money.
- July 2019 – a Senate motion for a dedicated capital works fund for public schools, the equivalent of the one private schools already had. Hanson and Roberts voted no.
- June 2017 – Hanson and Roberts voted yes on a bill to deliver less funding for public schools.
- February 2017 – Roberts had already voted no on a separate needs-based school funding motion, his third vote against public schools in this same pattern.
Cory Bernardi voted no alongside Hanson and Roberts on both 2019 motions, and Barnaby Joyce voted in the House in 2017 for the Coalition's lower-funding model.
It's all on the public record. See the full record on public schools, with every vote sourced.
Sources
- Senate motion, “Schools – Needs-based funding model”, 13 February 2017.
- Australian Education Amendment Bill 2017, divisions of 21 June 2017.
- Senate motion, “Education – Capital works fund for public school”, 31 July 2019.
- Senate motion, “Schools – Drought”, 3 December 2019.
- All searchable at theyvoteforyou.org.au and in Hansard.
Tafe
Supporting apprentices, or voting against them?
Starting an apprenticeship means finding a couple of grand for tools before you've earned a cent. For a working family backing a kid through a trade, that's real money upfront, on top of everything else.
There used to be $5,500 to help with exactly that, paid in cash, tax free, across the apprenticeship. It was scrapped in 2014 and swapped for a loan instead – up to $20,000 of debt to pay back.
Twice since, parliament has had the chance to make TAFE fee-free. Both times, One Nation senators voted no.
- July 2025 – Pauline Hanson, Malcolm Roberts and fellow One Nation senator Tyron Whitten all voted no to an amendment making university and TAFE fee-free. The same day, Hanson spoke against wiping 20 per cent of student debt – around $244 million in apprentice loans and $317 million in VET loans, gone for people already qualified and working.
- October 2023 – Hanson and Roberts voted no to the same fee-free TAFE proposal, two years earlier.
Construction is one of the trades free TAFE was built for, and every side of politics agrees Australia needs more houses built. Hard to do that without tradies, and harder still to become one while carrying debt for tools and training most other apprentices don't have to pay for.
Every vote here is checkable in a couple of minutes. Links below.
Sources
- They Vote For You, “Making TAFE education fee-free”.
- Parliament of Australia, Free TAFE Bill 2024.
- Andrew Giles, Free TAFE Bill 2024 second-reading speech, 7 November 2024.
- Senate Hansard, 2014 Trade Support Loans division, 14 July 2014.
Parental Leave
Having a baby already means less money coming in and more going out. Working families count on paid parental leave to get them through the early years with their children.
In 2020, when a lot of women lost their jobs during the pandemic while pregnant, parliament had two separate chances to let them keep access to paid parental leave anyway. Malcolm Roberts voted no both times.
That wasn't a one-off.
- March 2024 – three votes on making paid parental leave better: getting the full 26 weeks sooner, and starting superannuation on it a year earlier so parents don't retire worse off for having kids. Roberts voted no on all three.
- March 2023 – three votes: adding superannuation to paid parental leave, and extending eligibility to PhD students. Roberts voted no on all three.
- June 2020 – alongside the two pandemic votes above, a third vote the same day would have let fathers claim the leave when the mother earned too much to qualify. Roberts voted no on that one too.
Across all nine of those votes, Roberts voted no every time. Pauline Hanson voted no on five and was absent for the other four.
It goes back further. In 2017, when the government wanted to lift paid parental leave from 18 to 20 weeks, Hanson opposed the increase outright, calling it part of a “welfare handout mentality”.
None of this is hidden. See the full record on paid parental leave, with every vote sourced.
Sources
- They Vote For You, Senate divisions on paid parental leave, 11 June 2020, 6 March 2023 and 18 March 2024.
- Guardian Australia report and Christian Porter radio interview, February 2017, on Hanson opposing the increase from 18 to 20 weeks.
Health
Seeing a doctor or filling a script shouldn't blow the weekly budget.
In 2023, parliament brought in 60-day dispensing – letting patients get two months of medicine on one script instead of two, worth up to $180 a year on some medicines. Hanson and Roberts both opposed it in the Senate.
It's not the only place they've voted against making healthcare more affordable.
- 2025 – Hanson voted no against expanding publicly funded dental care, including the Senior Dental Benefits Scheme.
- 2018 – Hanson voted no on a Senate motion to expand “Denticare” access, a push for Medicare-style universal dental coverage.
- 2014 – Barnaby Joyce and Cory Bernardi voted for a federal Budget that cut $54 billion in public hospital funding.
It's all on the public record. See the full record on health and medicines, with every vote sourced.
Sources
- Australian Parliament, Senate Hansard, 60-day dispensing disallowance proceedings, 10 August 2023.
- They Vote For You, Pauline Hanson – expanding publicly funded dental care.
- Commonwealth Budget 2014–15.
- ABC News, “Has hospital funding been cut by $50 billion?”, 23 June 2014.
Support Payments
Support when you need it most, or not at all?
Sometimes work isn't enough, or isn't there at all, and the payments that fill the gap matter more than politicians talk about.
In March 2021, right as JobKeeper was ending, parliament was warned that unemployment payments were about to be cut by $100 a fortnight – more than $2,600 a year – for over 1.3 million people relying on them. There were two separate chances that same afternoon to stop it.
- March 2021 – an amendment to lift the JobSeeker payment above the poverty line. Hanson and Roberts voted no.
- March 2021 – a second amendment, the same afternoon, that would have blocked the $100-a-fortnight cut outright. Hanson and Roberts voted no again.
Looking across nine votes on welfare payments since 2016, the independent record at They Vote For You rates Hanson as having voted almost always to make these payments harder to get, not easier.
It's all on the public record. Have a look yourself.
Sources
- They Vote For You, Social Services Legislation Amendment (Strengthening Income Support) Bill 2021, Senate divisions of 18 March 2021 (“Increase Jobseeker Payment” and “Unemployment pay”).
- They Vote For You – Pauline Hanson, decreasing availability of welfare payments.
FAQ
The questions people ask us most.
We're not here to tell you that. Working Families for Victoria doesn't back a party, and we won't tell you where to put your vote. That decision is yours.
We ask one thing: know what you're voting for.
One Nation says it stands for everyday Australians and working families. That's worth checking against the record. Over the past two decades, One Nation senators have repeatedly voted against laws built to raise wages and protect penalty rates, against making childcare and TAFE more affordable, against expanding paid parental leave, and against cheaper medicines and dental care. Victorians should know that before they vote.
One thing worth remembering: Victoria uses preferential voting, so every box gets numbered. Whoever you back first is entirely up to you. But if there's a candidate whose record concerns you, numbering them last makes sure your vote never helps elect them, no matter who you put first.
No. We're telling you to check the record before you decide. If you look into it and still think they're the right choice, that's your call. We just think voters should know how a party that says it's “for working families” has actually voted on the issues that affect us.
We understand why it might look that way. But the same standard should apply to any party asking for your vote. If a party says it stands for working families, its record should be easy to check. That's all this is. Both major parties get plenty of scrutiny, and rightly so. A party that could hold the balance of power in the next parliament deserves the same.
One Nation is polling at levels that could see them hold real power after this election, in seats they've never won before. That makes their record worth the same scrutiny already applied to the major parties, not less.
One Nation's Victorian candidates haven't cast a vote yet. That's the nature of a state election. What's on this site is the record of federal One Nation senators, who share a party name, a leader and a platform with the Victorian candidates on your ballot. A federal voting record isn't proof of what a state candidate will do, but it is the clearest evidence available about where the party stands when it counts.
That's fair, and a lot of people feel that way right now. We'd only ask: is this the change you're actually looking for? A party with a record of voting against pay rises, cheaper childcare and paid parental leave might not be the change working families are hoping for. Worth checking before you decide.
No. We haven't endorsed anyone and we're not going to. Our only interest is making sure Victorians have accurate information about who they're voting for.
Everything we reference – parliamentary voting records, direct quotes, public statements – is publicly available and linked wherever we cite it. We'd rather you checked it yourself than took our word for it. Here's how we source it.
Yes. Wages, healthcare, education, childcare and parental leave touch most Victorians in some way, whether you're raising kids, saving for a first home, working shifts, or just trying to keep up with the cost of living. If you vote in Victoria, this is for you.
A group of Victorian parents, workers, carers and everyday people who think voters deserve the full picture before they head to the polls. We're not affiliated with any political party or union. More about us.